That's the 1st gen, not the R. It's butt ugly, IMO.
Thanks for clarifying, I didn't realize that. I'd be looking into a watch if it had a good heart rate monitor for workouts. GPS would be a nice bonus.
That's the 1st gen, not the R. It's butt ugly, IMO.
Well, if I was going to buy one of those, which I'm not , I'd take a look at Woot.com's deal for today...
http://electronics.woot.com/?ref=gh_el_3
Thanks for clarifying, I didn't realize that. I'd be looking into a watch if it had a good heart rate monitor for workouts. GPS would be a nice bonus.
I'm a little skeptical of the HRM capabilities of the Apple Watch. My coworker has one, and I saw him the other day with it on. I asked him about the HRM and he said that its great, showed me how it tracks, etc. He then told me to try it on and check it out. It showed my hr at 84-86 just standing still. I then walked down the hall and back, and it was 92 during my walk. I told him that it must be wrong, and he said it couldn't be wrong. He actually had no idea what a hr should be, so he googled it. He then sat at his desk and just let it track him for a few minutes without him doing anything, not even talking. His hr was averaging 82 over the 2 minutes he sat there. Per our google search , it should have been in the 60-70 range at the most. He then went back into the history and it showed that his hr was in the high 70s while sleeping, mostly mid to high 80s during the days and around 90-100 during his commute. It all just didn't make sense.
He did read that if you have the strap just a little too tight or a little too loose, it won't track properly. When I was wearing it, I had it on the right setting for where I would want to wear the watch. If that wasn't right for the HRM to work, then its useless to me. For that feature anyway, which is a big one, but not at the top of the list.
Companies with far more experience and expertise than Apple (Polar, etc) have struggled for years to get wrist worn HRMs to record with consistent accuracy. I'm not sure why anyone would think a smart watch would be any more reliable than those company's products?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
As I said previously, I actually think it's pretty decent. I wouldn't necessarily base medical decisions off of it, but as an exercise monitor I think it's pretty good. As I feel my pulse the animated beating heart is in really good unison with my actual pulse.
It's maintaining a decent charge. I'm on a Cub Scout camping trip this weekend and I didn't bring my watch charger (on purpose) and I think it will make it theough the weekend just fine. I'm currently at 41%. That being said, having to charge it every day or two I think will be the biggest downfall of this category of product.
Ive had my watch now for about 2 weeks and I must say I really love it. After reading some of the early reviews my expectations were pretty low. But now having used it for for two weeks I really think its a great product. Not for everyone but if you enjoy using new tech objects you will. My favorite feature is its ability to get text messages and phone calls. But really its how easy it is to respond. Its easier and a lot quicker than using the phone. I like its function the most when I am at work. I can be anywhere in our building and get my messages. I don't have to carry my phone with me (on same wifi network). And its a lot less obvious then someone using their phone. I am not a heavy user and my battery easily last two days before the next charge. I also like just how it feels on my wrist. Very comfortable, more than any watch I have.
Yeah, it certainly makes you feel kinda free from the smartphone if you're looking for only important notifications.
My wife is loving it on her runs since it gives her great info such as hear rate and distance. It's much more functional than her garmin watch.
That headline is perfect. lolApple Says Sporadic Apple Watch Heart Rate Readings Are a Feature, Not a Bug - by Dante D'Orazio/ Apple/ Tech/ TheVerge.com
Yeah, they can be accurate, but they're highly sensitive to positioning and skin contact -- two things that can vary greatly when exercising. Even the chest straps are sensitive to contact.
Yes, but chest straps are more accurate. And some brands are more accurate than others.
Despite what I'm going to say below, I still DO love my Apple Watch for everything else. Notifications, alarms, messages, taps, calendar alerts, composing messages (voice-to-text is a million times better on the watch than using Siri on the phone), etc. I've actually found myself leaving the house without the actual phone by accident, since I'm so used to only needing the watch.
But really? I hate it for working out - the heart rate is not taken frequently enough to get good data e.g. missing the higher rate of a run up a hill and only getting an update back on a flat, you don't get breakdowns of mile pace or elevation, you don't get max HR or time in different HR zones...
...and to add insult to injury, the limited data you DO get is hidden in the Activity app on the phone (no, you can't go into the Workout app and see ANYTHING) which requires multiple clicks to find each day's workout separately. Emphasis on separately - the data cannot be seen comprehensively nor be exported. Even simple step trackers like Fitbit and Up can show you your workouts together, and/or apps like MapMyFitness or Endomondo or Strava.
If you are in any way interested in data analysis, Apple dropped the ball on this one. Should be fixable with future updates, but in the meantime it's beyond aggravating!