I am glad to see this posted here. I love going to Mexico, and the thread about the death of a 20 year old woman was very disturbing. The U.S. has issued a warning about tainted alcohol. It looks like the 20 year old's death was due to involuntary manslaughter. Though not proven, all the evidence suggests this is the case. The All Inclusive resort where the woman drowned - one of the Iberostar resorts, was one of 2 resorts closed down in the Cancun area due to having "tainted" alcohol. The woman's mother was quoted saying how important the finding was. Hopefully, the parents can have some peace at least having a better understanding of what happened to their daughter. My heart goes out to them.
I am glad to see this posted here. I love going to Mexico, and the thread about the death of a 20 year old woman was very disturbing. The U.S. has issued a warning about tainted alcohol. It looks like the 20 year old's death was due to involuntary manslaughter. Though not proven, all the evidence suggests this is the case. The All Inclusive resort where the woman drowned - one of the Iberostar resorts, was one of 2 resorts closed down in the Cancun area due to having "tainted" alcohol. The woman's mother was quoted saying how important the finding was. Hopefully, the parents can have some peace at least having a better understanding of what happened to their daughter. My heart goes out to them.
While these reports won't prevent me from visiting Mexico again, I hope people will not "poopoo" posts that display realistic negativity toward Mexico. There are some real problems with drug cartels, and now we learn with some of the alcohol people have been drinking. The article mentions that tens of millions of gallons of "tainted" alcohol have been found in resorts by authorities since 2010. This is not a new problem; it just wasn't publicized until recently, and the U.S. has finally issued warnings about it to travelers. It is a very sad story.
Will these issues prevent me from visiting Mexico? No. But it is important that people know the risks they are facing when traveling anywhere. And it is important that governments share with the public what they know to be true. The alcohol situation is one which has been know by the Mexican government, but nothing was done until it became a risk to their tourism industry. Very sad.
I have not seen a single report that verified "tainted" alcohol at Mexican resorts. It would be so simple to prove that as well -- take a sample and have it tested. But instead, we get these stupid sensationalized reports that people take for gospel without applying any kind of logical thinking.I'm confused. There's lots of evidence of illegal alcohol but is it all "tainted"? If it's all tainted, people should be dropping like flies at open bars but they are not. OTOH, drugging people with illegal or legal alcohol can and does happen as well as intoxication by drinking too much of any kind of liquor at an open bar.
Exactly! Bootleg liquor ≠ tainted liquor!Seems to me there's clearly a lot of bootleg liquor in Mexico, but it isn't all poison unless there's a lot of dead people or drug victims hidden someplace. Equating bootleg with "tainted" is typical for what passes for journalism these days.
Wow! If I blindly believed all of the sensationalized "journalism" out there, you are an extremely lucky person to make it out of there alive!BTW, I was at Iberostar Paradiso Del Mar (one of the resorts cited) for a week earlier this year and survived as well as another 5 days at Lagunamar in Cancun.
But Mommy and Daddy are trying to deflect the fact that they are bad parents by providing no parental guidance and cut their kids loose at an all-you-can-drink bar, so there must be some nefarious conspiracy!Uh huh, like the evidence that she & her brother consumed multiple shots of liquor within a short period of time, ended up with 0.25 BAC, completed inebriated, then dove into the shallow end of a pool. That's manslaughter these days, is it? Her broken clavicle is some of the evidence of manslaughter, huh? And the golf ball sized lump on her brothers head also, right?
Agreed.Good grief.
I think "tainted" is their definition of alcohol that has simply bypassed the taxation process.
But Mommy and Daddy are trying to deflect the fact that they are bad parents by providing no parental guidance and cut their kids loose at an all-you-can-drink bar, so there must be some nefarious conspiracy!
Agreed.
Kurt
Where exactly did you find evidence that "she & her brother ... dove into the shallow end of a pool"?Uh huh, like the evidence that she & her brother consumed multiple shots of liquor within a short period of time, ended up with 0.25 BAC, completed inebriated, then dove into the shallow end of a pool. That's manslaughter these days, is it? Her broken clavicle is some of the evidence of manslaughter, huh? And the golf ball sized lump on her brothers head also, right?
Good grief.
Where exactly did you find evidence that "she & her brother ... dove into the shallow end of a pool"?
Sounds more like a guess. Common sense and abductive reasoning are not evidence of anything. The fact that it could have happened does not mean that it did. Reasoning does not ignore the multiple, independent reports by travelers of being intoxicated to the state of incapacitation after only 1 or 2 drinks.It's called common sense and abductive reasoning.
It is certainly good that Mexican authorities are cracking down on bars and resorts that use "bootleg" alcohol. I would like them to publish the names of the establishments that do that; while I am quite sure little (but some) of the "bootleg" booze is tainted, I am also quite confident that most tainted liquor would be bootleg - so I would just as soon not frequent those places.
It would also seem logical that most of the potential culprits will be AI resorts and bars with very liberal happy hour policies as that could dramatically affect their bottom line. While I won't ever do AI (too expensive / lower food quality / inflexibility), I must admit I have been drawn into some of the cheap bars while women shop; so far so good - but might rethink that a bit. With that said, I can't imagine anyone assuming or implying that the majority of Mexican resorts are guilty by implication; unfortunately, that is what our journalists love to do.
Mike
After years and years of owning property in and living in Mexico, I've finally gotten it through my head that, as one of our attorneys said, "In Mexico, corruption is everywhere, top to bottom; you must understand that. Americans have difficulty dealing with that fact and simply do not know what is necessary/required to be done."
He is correct: we learn (it seems like every year at least) some new area we had no idea about. That doesn't mean I don't love Mexico, nor does it mean I'm never going back. It does mean that something like illegal alcohol probably is quite widespread, and is probably totally beyond the government's ability to control--and if they do try control it, there will be bribes paid, and some will continue to serve illegal alcohol; some won't be allowed to, and some will suffer harsh "control efforts."
Americans will continue to be disappointed if they believe that American ideas of what should be legal will apply or that American ideas of how enforcement should be accomplished will apply. The Mexican government certainly doesn't want people dropping dead in the bars, and neither do the owners of the bars--and that isn't happening. As others have said, looking at this case logically makes it pretty clear that illegal alcohol wasn't the cause of death.
If you are referring to the sister-brother incident, the brother admitted doing many shots and lost count of how many.Sounds more like a guess. Common sense and abductive reasoning are not evidence of anything. The fact that it could have happened does not mean that it did. Reasoning does not ignore the multiple, independent reports by travelers of being intoxicated to the state of incapacitation after only 1 or 2 drinks.
I agree, but after reading about what happened at that resort, logic tends to favor the "dive into the shallow end" hypothesis. The injuries, number of drinks the brother admitted/remembered them drinking (it was more than 2 when they started doing multiple shots!), amount of alcohol in the kids' systems, other guests accounts, etc.Sounds more like a guess. Common sense and abductive reasoning are not evidence of anything. The fact that it could have happened does not mean that it did.
Reasoning does not ignore the multiple, independent reports by travelers of being intoxicated to the state of incapacitation after only 1 or 2 drinks.
Sounds more like a guess. Common sense and abductive reasoning are not evidence of anything. The fact that it could have happened does not mean that it did. Reasoning does not ignore the multiple, independent reports by travelers of being intoxicated to the state of incapacitation after only 1 or 2 drinks.