Or why should anybody but him care? If he does care (which he should if for no reason other than family health history) he can pay for and get a DNA test that would prove or disprove paternity.
Question settled once and for all.
Jim
Apparently YOU cared.
Cared enough to open the thread, and reply.
Sometimes, when you have nothing pleasant to say, you should say just that.
Nothing.
Apparently YOU cared.
Cared enough to open the thread, and reply.
Sometimes, when you have nothing pleasant to say, you should say just that.
Nothing.
If I was Ronan, I'd FAR RATHER be Sinatra's kid!
Jim wasn't mean at all. I don't get why your dander is up.
Jim wasn't mean at all. I don't get why your dander is up.
I don't recall saying he WAS mean.
Pompous isn't mean.
It's just, pompous.
I think you have crossed the line here. I agree with Jim and am wondering just who is the pompous one here.
Getting a little personal here, Laura. The only thing I did was comment on a link that was simply presented uneditorialized. We've had discussions here about those, and urged folks who choose to post links, at least present their thoughts regarding them, and invite discussion. That's why we have open forums.
If I come across to you as pompous, I apologize. If you are so offended, Laura, please put me on your ignore list. I wish to offend no one, but will not back down from who I am based on one person's opinion.
Jim
I love what Ronan Farrow tweeted in response: "Listen, we're all *possibly* Frank Sinatra's son."
I don't recall saying he WAS mean.
Pompous isn't mean.
It's just, pompous.