Lawlar
TUG Member
For my wife and me the allure of our Marriott timeshare was that we were purchasing a piece of property – a deeded interest. That interest could be held for life then left to our heirs. I always wanted to own property in Maui, so the idea of owning a week of oceanfront property had an appeal, even if I knew intellectually that it was obscenely overpriced (multiply the cost of one week times 52 and you see how ridiculous the purchase price was). But whether the purchase was wise or foolish, as long as we could pay the MFs, we owned our deeded interest in “our unit” every fourth week of the year.
I suspect that the attraction of owning a “real estate deed” was an effective selling point for the salespeople. The presentations we attended always included the salesreps suggesting in various ways, subtle and direct, that real estate always appreciates in value and the different phases of Marriott’s developments always come on the market at a higher price.
So why is Marriott going to a points system? What is the appeal of buying points? Wouldn’t a prospective customer conclude that it makes more sense to pay cash every year than to buy into a difficult to understand system based on points that can be depreciated?
Is Marriott going to guarantee that a certain amount of points will always be worth one week’s stay at certain resorts? DaveM’s very helpful sticky explaining the points system says that a new customer will have to pay a minimum of $36,800, with yearly MFs of $1,600 (gee, our MOC fees don’t seem so bad after reading that figure), in order to have a useful package for top resorts.
I guess good salesreps can sell swimsuits to Eskimos, but will this new program be as appealing to prospective customers as when the reps could point to a new building and say: “how would you like to own a piece of this choice real estate?
I don’t understand the appeal of points. I would love to read opinions of why Marriott has shifted from the old concept of selling deeds and why anyone would be interested in buying these murky points.
I suspect that the attraction of owning a “real estate deed” was an effective selling point for the salespeople. The presentations we attended always included the salesreps suggesting in various ways, subtle and direct, that real estate always appreciates in value and the different phases of Marriott’s developments always come on the market at a higher price.
So why is Marriott going to a points system? What is the appeal of buying points? Wouldn’t a prospective customer conclude that it makes more sense to pay cash every year than to buy into a difficult to understand system based on points that can be depreciated?
Is Marriott going to guarantee that a certain amount of points will always be worth one week’s stay at certain resorts? DaveM’s very helpful sticky explaining the points system says that a new customer will have to pay a minimum of $36,800, with yearly MFs of $1,600 (gee, our MOC fees don’t seem so bad after reading that figure), in order to have a useful package for top resorts.
I guess good salesreps can sell swimsuits to Eskimos, but will this new program be as appealing to prospective customers as when the reps could point to a new building and say: “how would you like to own a piece of this choice real estate?
I don’t understand the appeal of points. I would love to read opinions of why Marriott has shifted from the old concept of selling deeds and why anyone would be interested in buying these murky points.