I bought into a group of ten owners sharing a resort that splits 20 weeks a year. Their protocol is to put 10 names into a hat and select the first 10 weeks according to luck of the draw. They do the second 10 weeks the same way. Each year they review the rules and I suggested - as a newcomer (as I am here) that they simply inverse the order in the selection of the 2nd week so that the chance of being 10th both times was statistically eliminated. This suggestion was embraced by a few and rejected by others that stated it made no statistical diffference.
And after the draw it seemed those opposed to change were luckier than those who weren't...go figure.
Any thoughts?
And after the draw it seemed those opposed to change were luckier than those who weren't...go figure.
Any thoughts?