My $0.02 worth...
<snip> I have taken some of those weeks that were only available to the Gold members.
You are also put ahead of the free members when requesting a week. <snip>
I am not an exchanger --- haven't been for years. We now just use what we own and occasionally rent (privately, never resort-direct) an additional week now and then.
That being said, the above-quoted portion of John's post clearly suggests that serious exchangers would certainly (and justifiably) likely always choose and want to be in the
front of the line, instead of being way back at the
end of the line when it comes to accessing finite available exchanges. Unless the additional cost for this "Gold" membership is truly exorbitant, I probably wouldn't even have to think twice about paying it (...if I was an exchanger at all, that is).
Now,
that being said, as an "outsider" (hopefully with some objectivity) I personally don't think it's
at all right for
any exchange company to artificially manufacture what is essentially a "caste" system by creating different "tiers" of membership. Wouldn't it be a lot more more fair and a lot more more equitable to just increase the membership fee a bit right across the board for
everyone and have just
one level of membership --- and thereby have (God forbid)
a completely level playing field with equal access to
all exchanges for
all members?
My personal opinion only. Maybe I'm just living in a dream world on this particular point. Yeah, I certainly know that it's "just business" (and it's certainly not just DAE doing it; RCI "Platinum" membership plays a similar "tiered" membership game. I've certainly "got no dog in this fight" --- just sayin' that it doesn't seem at all right or fair to me.