Comparing apples to oranges...
I bet 80%+ of people got into their timeshare on lies. <snip>
We don't "exchange" at all any more, nor have we ever been on
either end of renting an exchange. Accordingly, I certainly have "no dog in this fight" --- and never did.
That being said however, I would point out a noteworthy, important, factual (and legal) distinction in two very different situations at issue here:
1. The oral nonsense and drivel from hungry, lying timeshare sales weasels is just non-binding hype, with no legal meaning or any potential consequences, spewed into the air as may be necessary to "close the deal". This is unfortunate and despicable, but completely irrelevant to the separate issue of improperly renting exchanges.
2. The prohibition against renting exchanges, unlike orally expressed and non-binding sales weasel fabrications and assertions, is very plainly stated in black and white, with clear potential consequences (denial of occupancy and / or forfeiture of deposit(s) and /or exchange company membership), clearly identified within the
written and openly published terms and conditions of membership in
both RCI and II.
One (...and only one) situation of the two mentioned above is crystal clear, with sharp teeth and potential serious consequences, announced in advance and in writing.