I hope that ILX (now DRI) people who read these posts, take all the opinions posted here with a grain of salt.
There are a lot of opinions here but too many facts are being omitted.
I'm not saying that people shouldn't be disappointed by some of the changes that occurred when DRI took over, but be honest with yourselves about the circumstances.
Ultimately DRI did "save" the ILX owners from having NOTHING (due to ILX bankruptcy).
DRI does cost more, because DRI is a more expansive and expensive/quality timeshare than ILX was.
I too was disappointed by the fee increases. Yet I factually understand them.
If anyone has questions about the DRI takeover, feel free to ask and I will be happy to give an unbiased, non opinionated account of what changed and why.
It seems that a lot of the posts here are simply opinions and not the actual what and why of what happened.
If you are just someone that does not want your timeshare, this is a bad place to be under DRI. If you want to use your timeshare, DRI actually has a pretty decent infrastructure.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Azfamily you are obviously very happy with your relationship with DRI, and you seem to be well versed on how they work, good for you! Have you ever considered a career with DRI? Perhaps you should ;-)
Allow me to make some things perfectly clear:
1- The information I have provided here, as relates to MY SITUATION, are FACTS, they are NOT opinions. Frankly, I couldn't care less about the "actual what and why of what happened" because that is all water under the bridge and not relevant to my situation.
2- "Ultimately DRI did "save" the ILX owners from having NOTHING (due to ILX bankruptcy)."
^^^^^ that would be an 'opinion' since the bankruptcy didn't fully playout, no one can say what the end result would have been. But I will concede your opinion that ILX owners would have been left with nothing, and in MY case, that would have been preferable to a DRI takeover. Who knows? I may have even been able to write the loss off on my taxes.
3- "Did the contract you originally bought change, yes."
And there's the rub! In order for a contract to be valid there has to be an offer, an acceptance and a meeting of the minds. What we bought may "no longer exist" but I can damn sure guarantee you that there was NO acceptance or meeting of the minds when DRI materially changed our contract!
4- "This is what you originally bought, so how upset can you be? Diamond retained what you originally bought)."
In case you haven't been keeping up on current events, the points required for a weeks stay at MY DEEDED RESORT far exceed the number of points DRI arbitrarily assigned to my deed. Setting aside the loss of flex weeks that I have previously addressed, I bought and paid for a deeded week that I can't use unless I buy more points - so NO this is NOT what I originally bought!
Look at it like this: Say I bought a fully loaded Ford car. In addition to paying for all those extras, part of what I paid for was a bumper to bumper, lifetime warrantee that carried an annual deductible. But then Ford filed bankruptcy and they were taken over by Lincoln. Lincoln informs me that they have removed all the extras I paid for because they don't fit their business model. In addition, my deductible has tripled, but I should be grateful because without them I would have to maintain my own car (at a fraction of the cost). And last but not least, they took the engine out of my car, but that's ok, I can buy it back from them.
Maybe the DRI cheerleaders can understand it now.