Couple observations: I have bought several timeshares on eBay, some from sean, some from other notorious sellers. Some had wrinkles, some were smooth as glass. Always, always print the auction after winning for your records. Never trust eBay feedback for timeshare sellers. By the time a real timeshare sale closes you can't leave feedback, it's too late. Also Wyndham's policy is to NOT transfer a unit to the new owner unless and until the MF is up to date. Hold them accountable for this and ask them to explain why and how that happened and demand that they correct, at the least, whatever fees were incurred before you got title. Then get on Sean's butt and demand your $ back for the MF you had to pay.
I agree. Ebay seller feedback is not as useful for timeshare sellers. Landmines like this usually aren't uncovered until long after the feedback window has closed.
I have nothing against Sean but he should absolutely cover this if required. He has always refused to provide Estoppels to anyone but the winning bidder under the claim that he is so good at what he does that the Bidder doesn't need to worry about the details because he has it covered.
If the ad said one thing, and it wasn't true, Sean has created a situation (based on how he runs his sales with only limited additional information given to the Bidder beyond the Ebay ad) where he shares in that blame. If he did the due diligence he claims he does, this ad should never have run advertising something that wasn't true.
I will say in any sellers "partial" defense (since I don't know all the details)...
I purchased a property from a Seller (not Sean) that was a deeded week with current year's use as long as I was willing to pay the MF. I agreed. About 3 months into the process, after it finally got transferred into my name, and when I went to schedule our vacation, the resort informed me that the previous owner was in RCI points and since RCI deposits the unit in points like a year in advance, and the previous owner had aged out and hadn't used the property for years, RCI had taken it at the 12 months in advance mark, and already traded it months before I even bought it. The Resort got the Estoppel wrong. The closing agent / company, which was a licensed real estate agent missed it. And the Seller missed it. In the end the only thing the resort would do is offer an apology for missing it, but wasn't going to do anything about it. Eventually the Seller reimbursed me for the MF I paid for something I couldn't even use.
The point being, Sean may have been given bad information, as I have seen bad Estoppels even directly from the resort. But if a Seller wants to be the best, or one of the best, they should always be willing to be the last man (or woman) standing and make it right. Fortunately in the case I described the Seller did that (they worked out a deal with the closing agent to split the MF cost) and I would use that Seller again without question because of how they handled the problem.
But where I think Sean probably has an even higher level of responsibility here as a Seller is because he can get curt or a bit gruff with anybody requesting additional information or questioning details in his ads. So his whole approach to his sales is that you don't need to bother him and waste his time with additional questions since he is the best and you can trust anything he is selling.
That approach as a Seller is only really acceptable as long as you are willing to stand 100% behind whatever you are selling and be willing to reimburse the Buyer if one of your ad gave bad information or was incorrect (whether intentional or not).