Good question...
Being new to Timesharing I am curious how TUG members feel about VRI or VRIety, either to exchange a week at their home resort or to exhange for a different VRI resort????
VRI*ety is itself relatively new (just a very few years old now). This question has been raised before (...you can find old posts on the subject via a "search").
When last discussed here, I seem to recall that there was not yet much experience gained or shared regarding VRI*ety --- good, bad or indifferent. I was (still am) quite interested in the topic myself, since the majority of my owned weeks are at VRI managed facilities. I personally think that VRI is a highly competent management company with a very strong track record in facility management. The VRI*ety program, however, is still relatively unknown / untested. The previous threads all seemed to conclude with folks suggesting to one another "Why don't
you try it and then let us know how it works out for you"?
Maybe now there will be folks weighing in with experiences gained since those old discussions...
As in any exchange system or program,
availabilty rules all. Accordingly, I have to wonder (I have no statistics, just my own curiousity) how much
prime availability would actually be "deposited" with VRI in the first place, since truly prime weeks / locations would seem (to me, anyhow) to likely be of much higher "value" (in a monetary sense) to their owners by being rented out when not used, instead of being deposited into a relatively small exchange pool of uncertain inventory. After all, VRI manages what? --- only about 125 resorts in the entire U.S. in the first place as I remember (and not all of them have signed on for VRI*ety either; it's a
voluntary choice for each resort as to whether they even wish to participate in VRI*ety).