I just deposited my Westin Kaanapali Resort week into II. The process required first cancelling an existing reservation for my week in July with Westin in order for them to deposit a week into Interval. In checking online with Interval later in the day, I come to find that Westin actually deposited into Interval a week from Westin Mission Hills Resort!
I called Westin to fix this error but instead they said there was no mistake. While I own at WKORV, they no longer had any weeks to deposit into Interval and thus had to deposit an alternative Westin resort. They claimed it would make no difference in my ability to trade within Interval as both the resorts are rated equally. My feeling is that one reason I paid more for WKORV over Mission Hills was that it (Maui) had better trading power than Palm Springs. It would seem true in this particular case as Westin has exhausted their WKORV inventory into II, and yet still has units in Mission Hills available to deposit.
Has anyone else heard of an alternative resort being deposited and is it true that these resorts do have exact equal trading power and I shouldn't be concerned about this?
I called Westin to fix this error but instead they said there was no mistake. While I own at WKORV, they no longer had any weeks to deposit into Interval and thus had to deposit an alternative Westin resort. They claimed it would make no difference in my ability to trade within Interval as both the resorts are rated equally. My feeling is that one reason I paid more for WKORV over Mission Hills was that it (Maui) had better trading power than Palm Springs. It would seem true in this particular case as Westin has exhausted their WKORV inventory into II, and yet still has units in Mission Hills available to deposit.
Has anyone else heard of an alternative resort being deposited and is it true that these resorts do have exact equal trading power and I shouldn't be concerned about this?