I'll bet that as soon as all the i's are dotted and t's are crossed there'll be directives from ILG to all VSE representatives that it's time to incorporate the new name into all literature and the reps' lexicons, if for no other reason than the Starwood hotel company deliberately separated itself in name from the timeshares in anticipation of being sold. Both suitors for HOT had contingencies in their offers that the timeshares have to be completely spun off in advance of closing. It's apparent that HOT doesn't want the timeshares to be acting as if nothing's changed.
As much as it's difficult to adjust to those changes, what good reason is there for TUG to not roll with them? SVN owners already know where to find their forum but this way, prospective VSE owners will be able to search for and easily find it. I agree with Denise that it'd be foolish to go back now when you consider that the name change stays regardless of what happens with the ILG takeover, and I think the way she proposed it (keeping the Starwood, Westin and Sheraton names front and center) works for all concerned.