Re: A bit of clarification
Steve said:
There have indeed been some misunderstandings in this thread.
Let me try to clear one thing up. A person who owns 1 week on Maui and 1 week somewhere else in the Marriott system CANNOT reserve 2 weeks on Maui at 13 months out. This is not how the system works.
Steve
A lot of the confusion is created because MVCI does not follow the rules (and they are a legal bind document files with the State). Steve, your example is flawed in that the rules for MOC (and Timber Lodge, Aruba and several other resorts) are worded to
require more than one week owned AT THAT RESORT to make a reservation 13 months out AT THAT RESORT. The MOC
rules (and many others) do not allow for a 13 month reservation at MOC when the consecutive week is at another resort.
E.g. you cannot reserve one week at Palm Desert and the next at Maui 13 months out as far as the rules are concerned. Additionally,
all reservation made 13 months out are required to be cancelled in there entirety if any one of the reservations are cancelled. Furthermore, the
weeks reserved 13 months out cannot be exchanged and at Maui at least they can’t be rented (at least as far as the rules go, but MVCI allows that to happen anyway). MVCI’s cooperate office and legal department as far as we know are still trying to sort out the mess that the sales department created when the changed the reservations policy with out changing the rules at all of the participating resorts. MVCI continues to ignore the rules of the resort and allow people to book 13 months out when they shouldn’t. For example say book Maui and Palm Desert as consecutive. We know that some are tempted to say you can’t, but there are owners on TUG that have said they have done just that. Even worse, there are owners that have stated that they have made reservations 13 months out by repeatedly calling reservations and demanding to make a reservation 13 months out just because they own more than one week. Eventually they harass the reservationists enough that they make the reservation for one week 13 months out. Again, that should never happen, but there are TUGgers that have said they have done it.
(We’ve been blasted more than enough for saying that :ignore

OOPs we did it again, guess we’ll get blasted again…
We stand by our statement that if you own at WKORV (or many other resorts) there is a good chance that you would be unhappy at MOC.
We intended to keep this private, but as long as we’re going to get bashed, may as well say it anyway.
We had no clue as to how then internals of MVCI worked when we bought our week. We love the resort (well at least until they plant two new 12 story towers on it anyway). We bought our week resale from another developer. The previous owner traded it in for The Mona Loa Village on the Big Island. We thought that they were nuts. We couldn’t figure out why someone would trade in the Maui Marriott for the Mona Loa Village (or any other resort for that matter). And then we found out.
Making reservations with MVCI is an absolute nightmare. A large contributing factor is the way that the resort allows MVCI to give high demand weeks to II for exchange when there are owners at the resort that would like to use those weeks. This makes it more difficult for owners to get the weeks that they need at their resort.
Marriott refuses to upgrade owners in their own resort. So for example, someone from Palm Desert paying half the maint. fees that we do in Maui get placed in an ocean front unit (while an owner at the resort remains in the ocean view/garden view room). The quality assurance rep told us that “if you want to be upgraded, you have to give your week to II and exchange back into your resort. We never upgrade owners in their resort.” We asked whey we couldn’t just pay the HOA the $99 and keep the money in our resort. She just said “we never upgrade owners in their own resort.” Marriott seems to cater to the exchange program. Those that are happiest are those that buy and generally trade out of their resort.
We just refuse to be treated second rate in our own resort.
We find it interesting when someone trades their XYZ resort (that is no where near a beach) into WKOVR (the nicest resort on the #1 island in the world) and then complains that they had a view of the parking lot because all of the ocean front units were given to people that own at the resort.
MOC closes the pool at 8pm - they extend it until 9pm in the summer (BTW: the spa down the walk at the Starwood resorts are open till 11PM). The cost of running the pool is almost a million dollars a year (that works out to about $35/day for your week stay). We don’t spend our money to go to Maui to hang at the pool, but we really like to crash in the spa after dinner and a day of exploring. That is difficult to do when it’s closed by 8 or 9PM.
The management fee Marriott collects works out to almost a third of the maint. fees (which are running almost $1300/yr for a 1BR). We feel that a 30% fee is just too high. The maint fees went from $800 to $1200 over the 3 years that we owned the resort. Meanwhile at EVR, the fees have gone from $590 to $650 over 4 years.
We felt that the property was crowded enough as it was, now they are building two new 12 story towers, one on each side of the existing buildings. And it appears that those owners will have rights to use the existing superpool, but it still isn't clear that the maint fees for these owners will be adjusted so the new towers will pick up their share of the pool costs. BTW the cost of the new units make the Westin look like a good deal.
The staff and management just don't seem to get the fact that the resort belongs to the owners. It still seems to run like a hotel. With the hotel operation gone, this may improve some. But we’re still not sure that the staff will ever figure out that their paycheck comes from the resort owners.
Dean said:
However it appeared to me daventrina had unreasonable expectations from what i recall of the various discussions.
We're not sure which of any of our expectations were unreasonable.
- It is not unreasonable to expect to be able to stay at your resort when you need/want to
- It is not unreasonable to expect to be treated as an owner in the resort that you own
- It is not unreasonable to expect to be able to use the pool/spa that you spend $1000000/year on within reasonable hours.
- It is not unreasonable to expect the company that manages the resort to follow the rules of the resort.
- It is not unreasonable to expedt the fees charges to manage the resort to be reasonable
So which of our expectations was it that are unresonable?