nanette0269
TUG Member
I'm sure that this has been discussed many times before, but I couldn't find it anywhere. I'm just curious what everyone's thoughts are on this. Since the voluntary resorts (for resale) are just voluntary for Starwood to add onto their SVN system, it seems like the power is in their hands. But, what benefit do they have by doing this?
* Is it to control inventory in the SVN...ie ensure that all properties/locations are balanced equally and not have 10:1 ratios of Vistana Resort to Hawaii locations?
* Or, is it to develop a more premiere resort system which caters to the upscale resorts, and the ones that are not mandatory will eventually be the red-headed stepchildren of Starwood?
* Do you think they plan on selling (or giving up the management) of the voluntary resorts in the future?
What other reasons could they have for doing this?
* Is it to control inventory in the SVN...ie ensure that all properties/locations are balanced equally and not have 10:1 ratios of Vistana Resort to Hawaii locations?
* Or, is it to develop a more premiere resort system which caters to the upscale resorts, and the ones that are not mandatory will eventually be the red-headed stepchildren of Starwood?
* Do you think they plan on selling (or giving up the management) of the voluntary resorts in the future?
What other reasons could they have for doing this?