• The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 30 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 31 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 31st anniversary: Happy 31st Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    Free memberships for every 50 subscribers!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $24,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $24 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

Any changes in your resort's RCI award level ranking?

djyamyam

djyamyam

TUG Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2005
Messages
1,329
Reaction score
253
Location
Canada
So it's now 2008, the start of the new status award year that RCI designates for its afiliate resorts. As you may know, this past year, RCI instituted a new survey and ranking process in order to resorts to maintain their status (gold crown, silver crown, hospitality).

Has it made any difference? Does the resort you own have its status change as a result? For those of you on the various HOAs, what difference has it made, if any?
 
FF Royal Sea Cliff dropped 2 levels

Well, I found one resort that dropped from gold crown to hospitality status. In looking at the TUG reviews, there are few of them in 2007 and they are positive for the most part. So maybe the new standards are having an impact.
 
Rankings have definitely gone down!

There must have been a delay from Jan 1 on having the resorts' statuses updated. I've relooked at a number of resorts and they've changed since Jan 1, most going down. The new rankings are definitely having a negative impact on resort statuses.
 
Originally, this was just an RCI issue but on further thought, this would also impact owners that use other exchange companies like SFX. SFX professes to only take GC status resorts, with a number of resorts dropping from that status (or from silver crown in some highly demanded areas), their inventory of allowable resorts just shrunk and some accepted resorts now just got dropped!

Additionally, for all those with RCI Points accounts, many own non-points resorts that they use for PFD. I can bet you that some of those resorts have dropped in their ranking, which means a decrease in the number of points they get for PFD, further dropping their value.

I can't believe no one has commented on this besides me!
 
Last edited:
I noticed a change in my resorts also: Gold Crown to Silver and my Silvers to Hospitality. How will this have an effect on trading power, if any?
 
Wyndham Ocean Walk went from GC to non-rated??
Worldmark Ocean Walk is GC--these are the same resort??!!
Also noticed Wyndham Bonnet Creek GC to non-rated, Wyndham Ocean Palms GC to non-rated, Wyndham Glacier Canyon GC to non-rated and these are just the few I checked--Bonnet Creek and Glaciet Canyon are both very new and very nice resorts could this be accurate???? Dawn
 
Bonnet Creek is unrated because it is never deposited, so no one can exchange in, so there are no guest comments on which to base a rating. Same with Glacier Canyon.

I have a fixed week at Peppertree @ Tamarack, which dropped from GC to SC. In all honesty, that's probably appropriate. It's a nice place, but not what I would call a plush resort.
 
bccash63 said:
Wyndham Ocean Walk went from GC to non-rated??
Worldmark Ocean Walk is GC--these are the same resort??!!
Also noticed Wyndham Bonnet Creek GC to non-rated, Wyndham Ocean Palms GC to non-rated, Wyndham Glacier Canyon GC to non-rated and these are just the few I checked--Bonnet Creek and Glaciet Canyon are both very new and very nice resorts could this be accurate???? Dawn
Click to expand...

Bonnet Creek would be a great example of a top resort with very few RCI guests so very few ratings cards - thus they didn't meet the minimum OR had a few bad cards (it only takes one or two per month) to ruin any ranking. The new higher requirements seem to be a push to reduce the number of ranked resorts. Plus the difference between Silver and Gold crown is so small that if you miss one you most likely miss both.

We need an independent system of resort ranking away from RCI/II as they are not in that business and the flawed systems they use don't fairly rate resorts anymore. As exchange use gets fragmented over many different companies no one or two have enough input to give valid rankings.
 
deleted duplicate
 
Last edited:
Is there a new list of RCI's requirement survey listed someplace??
 
djyamyam said:
Additionally, for all those with RCI Points accounts, many own non-points resorts that they use for PFD. I can bet you that some of those resorts have dropped in their ranking, which means a decrease in the number of points they get for PFD, further dropping their value.
QUOTE]

Conversely, RCI Points owners will need less points to book into those resorts whose ratings got downgraded, right?
Click to expand...
 
djyamyam said:
Well, I found one resort that dropped from gold crown to hospitality status. In looking at the TUG reviews, there are few of them in 2007 and they are positive for the most part. So maybe the new standards are having an impact.
Click to expand...
Wow - we stayed at Royal Sea Cliff in October, in a totally renovated (and ocean-view) unit, and it was one of the nicest units we've ever stayed in - IMO absolutely GC in every way. Maybe when they complete all the unit renovations, it will be back up at GC; I can't think of any GC standard which our unit, or the public areas of the resort, didn't meet.
 
I believe San Luis Bay Inn dropped one, from gold to silver crown. I'd also like to see the changes in requirements, if anyone has that.
 
Now you have me wondering. It appears that the Pahio resorts took a HUGE hit. The Shearwater, Silver Crown. Kai Eo Kai, Hospitality. Bali Hai and Kauai Beach Club, unrated.

Meanwhile, I looked at two basic motel conversions that I have stayed at elsewhere... Neither of them at all distinguished. They were Silver Crown.
 
Hophop4 said:
Is there a new list of RCI's requirement survey listed someplace??
Click to expand...

Carolinan had posted the following last summer:


New RCI award status criteria

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Effective in September, there will be a new RCI comment card and new criteria for award status.

There will still be a 1 to 5 rating, but the meaning for each number will change. Currently, it is 5- extremely satisfied, 4- very satisfied, 3- satisfied,
2- somewhat satisfied, 1- not at all satisfied.

Now there will only be descriptors on the top end (5- very satisfied) and low end (1- very dissatisfied).

The treshholds for award status have changed, with the numbers higher than at present, and target levels this time in all ranking categories for Hospitality status. The categories used for ranking award status are: check-in/out, resort hospitality, resort maintenance, unit maintenance, and unit housekeeping.

New award status requirements are:

award status / check-in/out / resort hosp. / resort main./ unit main./ hskping
GC 4.6 / 4.5 / 4.5 / 4.4 / 4.5
SC 4.5 / 4.4 / 4.3 / 4.2 / 4.3
Hosp. 4.6 / 4.5 / 3.5 / 3.5 / 3.5
These are for 12 month averages. There are additional criteria for GC's other than the numbers.
 
timeos2 said:
Bonnet Creek would be a great example of a top resort with very few RCI guests so very few ratings cards - thus they didn't meet the minimum OR had a few bad cards (it only takes one or two per month) to ruin any ranking. The new higher requirements seem to be a push to reduce the number of ranked resorts. Plus the difference between Silver and Gold crown is so small that if you miss one you most likely miss both.

We need an independent system of resort ranking away from RCI/II as they are not in that business and the flawed systems they use don't fairly rate resorts anymore. As exchange use gets fragmented over many different companies no one or two have enough input to give valid rankings.
Click to expand...

John, I remember a long thread last year on this when Carolinan first posted about the new rankings and some test surveys RCI had done saying the new survey cards were generating higher survey results, hence they were raising the award criteria. I know you had posted on this a bit but can't seem to find that thread.

There's really been no discussion on this because this week is realy only the first time there has been any public impact of the new rankings since it takes a year for the results to be compiled.
 
djyamyam said:
John, I remember a long thread last year on this when Carolinan first posted about the new rankings and some test surveys RCI had done saying the new survey cards were generating higher survey results, hence they were raising the award criteria. I know you had posted on this a bit but can't seem to find that thread.

There's really been no discussion on this because this week is realy only the first time there has been any public impact of the new rankings since it takes a year for the results to be compiled.
Click to expand...

It seems the rise in scores - which I'm not convinced occurred - was more than offset by a drop in reports returned (you can do them with optional methods now not just the cards). It seems the goal was to cull many of the ranked resorts to make it more exclusive. If so it worked. It also played into the hands of the mega-resorts that use only one ID code as the ability to get a ranking is directly related to the shear number of returns - even more than the individual scores on any one rating.
I also see how the rankings are skewed by areas. In Orlando for example resorts with top quality furnishings & designs as well as a ton of features struggle to make even Silver Crown. While in the Northeast a small resort, no kitchens, got scores that would have given it Gold Crown (they opted to turn the award down). No consistency or benchmarks to make the award equal at all locations.

We even sat down with a high level RCI executive to discuss the issue and they just had a bunch of platitudes to offer - they can't really control the guests either. They did slip and say at one point "Of course we do rentals - it's in our name". Oh really? Where? We weren't impressed by them or that they had any appreciation for the mood of their members.

I do hope an independent resort ranking - all resorts not just those that RCI/II get enough input for - evolves as we need a true measurement of quality in timesharing.
 
Last edited:
Well, this is interesting. As already mentioned, PAHIO @ Kauai Beach Villas has dropped from Gold Crown to unrated. (I wonder if it's related to the new swimming pool they're building this year?) But I also see that Mauna Loa Village by the Sea (not the Shell side) dropped from Silver Crown to not rated, as well. Two newly-purchased Wyndham resorts that now are unrated.

So that means all three resorts I own are now unrated. I wonder if this is significant? I can't believe the resort ratings are THAT fragile. Are they?

Dave
 
To be honest, this has all the markings of some executive getting a performance bonus for revamping the system regardless of whether the new system is indicative of anything. I see some of just what John is talking about... a motel conversion without a kitchen, with very so so furnishings, somewhat worn, with tight spaces, getting a Silver Crown while resorts with a ton of amenties getting nothing.

If the awards don't indicate supply and demand (never had), don't reflect quality, what is left?

(This goes beyond just a judgment call. It is patently obvious with some of the resorts that the new designations are totally screwy.)
 
jeepguynw said:
Well, this is interesting. As already mentioned, PAHIO @ Kauai Beach Villas has dropped from Gold Crown to unrated. (I wonder if it's related to the new swimming pool they're building this year?) But I also see that Mauna Loa Village by the Sea (not the Shell side) dropped from Silver Crown to not rated, as well. Two newly-purchased Wyndham resorts that now are unrated.

So that means all three resorts I own are now unrated. I wonder if this is significant? I can't believe the resort ratings are THAT fragile. Are they?

Dave
Click to expand...

Yes, they are. And a small change in return count or a bunch of 3's (or worse 1's or 2's) on a report and it takes 5 perfect scores (quite rare) to get back to a ranking. All at the whim of guests trading in - maybe not to the resort they requested & with a chip on their shoulder - it is tough to get a ranking and getting tougher to hold it. Add in that new resorts, filled with promises of features & quality that don't have to get guest cards for 3-5 years can be awarded a rank - largely for sales support - and then may quickly fall when actual rank from guests kick in.
 
timeos2 said:
Add in that new resorts, filled with promises of features & quality that don't have to get guest cards for 3-5 years can be awarded a rank - largely for sales support - and then may quickly fall when actual rank from guests kick in.
Click to expand...

Can you explain this further? I don't understand how report cards don't apply to them.
 
djyamyam said:
Can you explain this further? I don't understand how report cards don't apply to them.
Click to expand...

When a resort is new it is "reviewed" by RCI (&/or II if so affiliated) to see what level of ranking they feel it is "likely" to get. It covers the unit size & features and whatever amenities are proposed/promise. Developers know this and put things in the plans to be sure it meets the minimum they desire (and leads to things like "vacuums" being those manual, worthless push things restaurants use to meet the requirement). That is true even if the promised exercise room, clubhouse & other common features are mere plans.

But even if the resort gets reviews that fail to meet that ranking it doesn't count as there are either too few or because the ranking runs almost 2 years behind. So they get a free pass for at least two years - maybe more - until the actual results start to determine the rank (if any).
 
Don't forget that RCI can give any developer (in sales) a "Gold Crown" rating for their timeshare (doesn't have to be the original developer, but a subsequent "developer). This helps the "developer" in their sales tactics.

HOWEVER, that "gold crown" rating is a "temporary" rating, while in sales. Once the developer leaves, the rating suddenly dissapears, and then the resort is downgraded to a lesser standard.

I've seen that happen with at least 3 timeshares that I am familiar with.

Tony
 
Was anything downgraded that isn't a Wyndham property? I wonder if that has anything to do with it. Doesn't Wyndham also own RCI now, too?

Dave
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top