WTH are you talking about?
@Kal (not Kai, by the way) hasn't posted anything on this topic since July 19th. So, how do you make a statement that you've returned after "happily staying away from it only to see that Kai [Sic] is still all riled up...?" Kal hasn't made a single comment on this topic for more than 3 weeks. In fact, the thread just kind of died after the vote. You really need to back off on your attacks of this member. You're making a lot of accusations with absolutely NOTHING to back them up with.
But since you decided to come back and stir up crap, let me assure you that the board member you're so fiercly protecting, did, in fact, send out a list of 2,000 owners at SH with protected information. Just because YOU didn't get it, doesn't mean the list wasn't sent out. It was - I have spoken to several people who are in receipt of it. Yes, some of the information was allowed to be sent out, but the extent of the information on that list was out of bounds as to what is allowed by Florida statute. While most of the information is available to owners, there is a process they have to follow to obtain it - it means they have to personally go review the records and pull the information THEMSELVES. No one is allowed to do it for them. And owners have every right to state they do not want their information shared. Without going to review the records myself, there is no way of knowing how many owners have indicated they don't want their information shared. Did the board member who sent the list out, look through 2,000 owner records to make that determination? I doubt it.
I'm not sure what the intent of your return to this topic was. Trying to figure out if anyone was going to pursue holding that board member accountable? I'll answer that for you - yes, there are people that are going to pursue holding that board member accountable for their actions. It extends well beyond the mailing of a list information on 2,000 owners. The board member outright lied to a number of people about how they cast their vote in regards to wanting to oust MWV/Hyatt. (I have a copy of the email they sent to people). The board member advocated STRONGLY for a departure from Hyatt/Marriott for years, voted as a board member
for the action to pursue it, and then subsequently for some unknown reason, did an about-face, and set about torpedoing the efforts of the board of directors. They don't get that luxury. As a board member, once a majority vote is taken by a board of directors on an issue, all members of the board are required to stand together behind that vote. The board member in question didn't do that - they simply set out to literally torpedo the very action they had wanted for years. What made them do that is unknown - at this time. Most certainly, research and/or a lawful deposition of that board member will get to the bottom of it.
Do not attempt in any fashion to get in
my face about this situation. You'll be fighting a losing battle. I'm not going to sit idly by while this board member tries to bully their personal agenda into place. After a lot of review on this current board of directors, I feel confident that the remaining board members have the best interests of owners and the resort at heart. I questioned that fiercly for awhile but after some research I realize the issue at hand lies almost solely at the feet of the subject board member. Their lack of ethics is astounding and they should resign. They won't but hopefully owners will see the light and make sure they're not voted back on the board during this next election. That would be a critical mistake by owners. So, if your intent was to come here to find out if things had died down....no they haven't. There are people genuinely concerned about what happened with all of this and they're going to make a concentrated effort to ensure it doesn't happen again. Hopefully this clarifies things for you.
My goodness people...I've just revisited this site after weeks of happily staying away from it only to see that Kai is still all riled up about some sort of list of names and addresses he has. I, for one, never received such a list that he says was distributed by the BOD member. I received a communication from the board member (whom I had previously personally given my information to) but not some "list" as Kai refers to.
Get a grip Kai...your information Is out there everywhere...why do you think timeshare owners incessantly receive those annoying solicitation calls from timeshare resellers and others (scammers). ...because they can easily access your information and contact phones and addresses. (Not because you somehow received a "list" and are suggesting it's from a BOD member (even if you are correct on your source???)
