Brian:
Two mischaracterizations (is that a word).
1. I do not support "getting out of" a timeshare "contract" without "penalty."
My words:
I am not opposed to a refundable termination fee, the amount of the termination fee being fair, and the amount of refund based on the Association's ability to replace that terminating owner's annual fee.
I'm not saying that 10 years of future annual fee payments is a fair amount to make this idea productive, but that can be compromised and worked out. Whatever it takes to take the angst out of timeshare ownership, resort-by-resort, is a good thing.
- - - - -
The deedback program they finally approved requires one year's maintenance fee and a $150 transfer fee. I countered with "I'll just Quit Claim it to you like I have Quit Claimed our other two weeks to new owners," and they said No. Then I countered with, I'll pay if you'll refund the extra fee if you sell or rent it for enough to pay it, and they said No.
So I said, what the Hey, we've talked this out for all these years, and I've already managed to transfer 6 weeks without any fees, so I'll just let the rental income we would receive in 2020 to offset that fee go, and we will finally be down to the two weeks that actually fit our needs now, 30 years after we started timesharing.
(That, really is the type of Exit Strategy I would support . . . a long-time, loyal owner working with a somewhat-open-minded resort to achieve a mutually satisfactory outcome, although some legacy resorts have made mutually-acceptable termination programs standard (and there has not been a mass Exodus).
There is nothing about anything I favor that would allow deadbeats to walk away from their obligations.
2. I am not blaming TUG for anything. I'm just saying those who followed the best advice 20 years ago now have problems that were not anticipated 20 years ago. So, what will 20 years from now be like for those who follow the best advice of today?