PerryM
TUG Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2005
- Messages
- 4,282
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 36
Destination Paradise - BBB rates it a "D"
I've really enjoyed this thread - state of the art internet marketing via shills.
Here is the BBB review of Destination Paradise - it gets a "D"; there are a lot of problems with this company.
So if you don't mind buying from a "D" company riddled with all kinds of consumer problems then go right ahead but don't come back here bellyaching when you get screwed.
Folks let me tell you that this is very good marketing on the company's part - it is state of the art; and they don't give up easily. This new marketing has shills invade a website and pretend to be just common folk and they will even bash the company but always seem to come around and endorse it.
P.S.
Last time I checked on this company BBB had it at a "C" - it has fallen since then; tough economic times.
P.P.S.
I don't have the time to do this but you could start down the management personnel table and I'd bet each has quite a colorful background. That would be a hoot. Typically the CEO and the marketing/sales guys have the most colorful history. If I had to guess both managers will have been involved with at least 2 prior bankruptcies each - that's how good these guys are.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think an "F" pool might be worthy for this company. Just when will all the hard work of this company be rewarded with a BBB of "F"?
I'll start - my guess is December 31, 2009 they will be awarded a BBB "F".
6 more months of hard work here and other websites ought to do it.
(That's my guess and please don't try to piggyback on my winnings; pick your own date please)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Note to Destination Paradise:
I noticed BBB only has 17 complaints with Sales Practices - you need to work harder if I'm going to win the above pool.
Let me know if you need some ideas - we timeshare folks get lied to all the time and I have a list of whoppers that you can use.
I'm rooting for you......
I've really enjoyed this thread - state of the art internet marketing via shills.
Here is the BBB review of Destination Paradise - it gets a "D"; there are a lot of problems with this company.
So if you don't mind buying from a "D" company riddled with all kinds of consumer problems then go right ahead but don't come back here bellyaching when you get screwed.
Folks let me tell you that this is very good marketing on the company's part - it is state of the art; and they don't give up easily. This new marketing has shills invade a website and pretend to be just common folk and they will even bash the company but always seem to come around and endorse it.
P.S.
Last time I checked on this company BBB had it at a "C" - it has fallen since then; tough economic times.
P.P.S.
I don't have the time to do this but you could start down the management personnel table and I'd bet each has quite a colorful background. That would be a hoot. Typically the CEO and the marketing/sales guys have the most colorful history. If I had to guess both managers will have been involved with at least 2 prior bankruptcies each - that's how good these guys are.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think an "F" pool might be worthy for this company. Just when will all the hard work of this company be rewarded with a BBB of "F"?
I'll start - my guess is December 31, 2009 they will be awarded a BBB "F".
6 more months of hard work here and other websites ought to do it.
(That's my guess and please don't try to piggyback on my winnings; pick your own date please)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Note to Destination Paradise:
I noticed BBB only has 17 complaints with Sales Practices - you need to work harder if I'm going to win the above pool.
Let me know if you need some ideas - we timeshare folks get lied to all the time and I have a list of whoppers that you can use.
I'm rooting for you......
Last edited: