• The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 30 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 30 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 30th anniversary: Happy 30th Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    Free memberships for every 50 subscribers!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $21,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $21 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    60,000+ subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

[2008] What happens if I just quit paying my maintenance fees?

CarGuy2003

TUG Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2010
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
San Clemente
... but you have the obligation to pay because you signed a contract stating that you would pay.
As far as I can figure out, no contract is signed by an owner of a timeshare who purchased it for cash (or received it for free) secondhand. The deed conveys obligations. But, it does NOT convey an obligation to own it forever and pay. If it was deeded in 2005 and dues were $390/year, and now in 2010 they're $610/year and the owner no longer chooses (or is able to) to own it and pay for said maintenance, the owner has made no commitment to do so. Any legal way of divesting it is acceptable. If it has no value and can't be given away, and the resort won't accept it, then using a company who will accept title for a price may be the best option.

For the person who accuses me of coming to this forum to promote a scheme, that's unfair and not correct. I'm trying to think out loud, in this forum, to find a solution for persons in this difficult situation.

I DO take responsibility for my choices. I teach my kids the same. BUT, I'm also not going to bullied into a responsibility that does not exist. That's what I'm trying to figure out here. Does a responsibility exist? It appears there is NO legal obligation to keep a free and clear timeshare I don't want. If the resort won't take it back, some of you appear to be arguing that the "Social Contract" requires I continue to pay. I disagree. By the way, at one timeshare in question, I'll be continuing to own 2 timeshares just as I divest of two, so I'm sitting in both shoes, those of the continuing owner and those of the divestor.
 

theo

TUG Review Crew: Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2007
Messages
9,032
Reaction score
2,268
Points
648
Location
New England Coast
'Round and 'round we continue to go...

As far as I can figure out, no contract is signed by an owner of a timeshare who purchased it for cash (or received it for free) secondhand..... The deed conveys obligations. But, it does NOT convey an obligation to own it forever and pay.

This thread seems to have become something of a circular discussion going 'round and 'round and 'round, but imho Dave H has already best described and summarized all of the pertinent legal details (see post #23 above) of why your position, as quoted in relevant part above, is simply incorrect.

In most private resales (i.e., those with no developer, company or broker involvement), it is relatively rare for a "signed contract" to exist at all at any point in the transaction. Nonetheless, the underlying governing documents of the timeshare, clearly referenced within the deed, still prevail and apply not one iota less to such a "private resale" new owner after the recording of a valid deed transferring the ownership. In short, the presence or absence of a "signed contract" is simply irrelevant. Upon acceptance of the timeshare ownership (whether for "free" or for big bucks consideration is equally irrelevant), the new owner clearly also "owns" all of the associated obligations until that new owner lawfully parts with his/her ownership.

The "social contract" aspect of this discussion is a matter of personal opinion. The permanency and certainty of ownership obligations however is instead clearly a matter of established law, unaffected by personal opinions, objections, or viewpoints. Increasing maintenance fees, albeit always unwelcome by any owner, do not in any way impact the validity or permanency of the ownership and / or its' associated legal obligations.

It's clear that you would like the answers and / or facts of the matter to be different, but endless discussion or defense of your position won't alter the facts of the matter, unpalatable as they may be to you.
 
Last edited:

e.bram

Guest
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
3,185
Reaction score
124
Points
399
Location
Fort Lee, NJ
I agree with CarGuy2003, so far no one has presented a case for personal obligation vis a vis MFs.
Theo: contracts being signed is irrelevant, why have a signature line on them?
 

theo

TUG Review Crew: Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2007
Messages
9,032
Reaction score
2,268
Points
648
Location
New England Coast
The TUG "ignore" feature is wonderful, but...

Theo: contracts being signed is irrelevant, why have a signature line on them?

...in this instance I unfortunately saw your post before remembering to first log on to TUG, so the "ignore" feature (put in place long ago for any and all of your drivel postings) was not yet "turned on".
That mistake certainly won't be repeated anytime soon...

As usual, you miss (...or choose to simply ignore, or to just completely misinterpret) the point entirely...

Yes, a formal written contract does indeed customarily have "signature lines". My point was (and still remains) that a signed, written contract is NEVER ACTUALLY REQUIRED AT ALL to lawfully effect a timeshare ownership transfer. The absence of any such contract is completely irrelevant when a valid deed is prepared and recorded and accepted and ownership obligations thereby transferred.

Get it yet??? I can't actually draw you a picture here, so try your best to somehow comprehend. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

Talent312

TUG Review Crew: Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2007
Messages
17,461
Reaction score
7,277
Points
948
Resorts Owned
HGVC & GTS
No, CarGuy, there is nothing in-writing that requires you keep and pay the TS forever and you are free to dispose of it. However, the trick is to dispose of it in a manner that meets the requirements for transfer on the books of the resort, such that the transfer is approved and your name removed as the owner of record.

Sure, the deed may transfer liability for the MF's to a new owner, but that won't necessarily stop the resort from hounding you. Its only after the resort transfers the ownership on its books that they will let you "off the hook." IOW, if a foreclosure action is filed, you may still expect to be named as a defendant 'cuz, as far as they are concerned, you still have an interest that needs to be "foreclosed."
 

e.bram

Guest
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
3,185
Reaction score
124
Points
399
Location
Fort Lee, NJ
If you want to get rid of the TS, why would you care if they foreclosed on your interest?
 

Dave H

TUG Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2007
Messages
417
Reaction score
3
Points
228
Location
Orlando
I agree with CarGuy2003, so far no one has presented a case for personal obligation vis a vis MFs.
Theo: contracts being signed is irrelevant, why have a signature line on them?

Here, you agreed to it when you ACCEPTED the DEED..... there is your case law. Subject to the following:

DECLARATION OF CONDOMINIUM

of course you can always join the black helicopter theorist, renounce your citizenship become a soverign person, and never have to be bothered with it our any other legal obligation you have. That is, if you believe that to be the case. I understand there is an organization in Florida that for $4,000 will help you do that, and then you can quit paying for your house to and argue with the court that as a soverign citizen, they lack jurisdiction to remove you from your home.:rofl: :hysterical:
 

e.bram

Guest
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
3,185
Reaction score
124
Points
399
Location
Fort Lee, NJ
DaveH:
Please cite the case law. That is what myself and CarGuy are looking for. Not pontification and conjecture.(given by Theo, Denise et al)
 

DeniseM

Moderator
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
57,668
Reaction score
9,088
Points
1,849
Resorts Owned
WKORV, WKV, 2-SDO, 4-Kauai Beach Villas, Island Park Village (Yellowstone), Hyatt High Sierra, Dolphin's Cove (Anaheim)
This all boils down to one simple question:

If this is such an easy way to get rid of a timeshare, why do you just TALK ABOUT IT - why haven't you done it? :deadhorse:
 
Last edited:

Fredm

TUG Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2005
Messages
1,782
Reaction score
8
Points
248
Location
Palm Desert, CA
DaveH:
Please cite the case law. That is what myself and CarGuy are looking for. Not pontification and conjecture.(given by Theo, Denise et al)

No, No.
If there is case law supporting your position, you should state it.

The rest of us have already clearly stated why your position has no defensible basis.
In so doing, sample and specific verbiage has been referenced to underscore why.

You know, the folks here on TUG have offered advice to help others from making mistakes that can be costly and damaging. If you wish to constructively contribute to the dialog, then offer similar concrete reasons for your disagreement. Not what you misguidedly choose to believe because it is convenient to a baseless argument.

Absent that, argue your position with a judge and let us know how it turns out. Nothing will impress us more than to see the courage of your convictions in action.
You prove your case. Our statements have been reinforced thousands of times by the actions of the laws you choose to disagree with.

BTW, signatures on a contract have nothing to do with the the transfer of rights and obligations of real estate. The signatures permit the buyer and seller to enforce the terms of the contract with one another. The buyer promises to perform and the seller promises to sell, all subject to the terms of the contract (time frames, contingencies, liquidated damages, amount, remedies for non-performance, etc etc).
 
Last edited:

Tommart

Tug Review Crew: Rookie
TUG Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
273
Reaction score
0
Points
126
Location
Centreville Virginia
From the HOAs Perspective

I concur that one should give it away, or pay to get rid of it.

I was able to return a timeshare to an HOA that I didn't want, but had to agree to pay a year's MF.

I was a President of a subdivision HOA (not timeshare). We had people who did not pay monthly assessments.

The cost to go to court was about $2K, but only about one-third of money owed is considered reasonable legal charges and could be reimbursed. Let's say the homeowner owed $3K and we went to court and paid $2K lawyer fee. We always won and would get $3K plus $1K for legal expenses. So we lost $1K.

If they only owed $1K, we would only be reimbursed $300 for legal expenses (even though it cost us $2K).

So we would wait until they owed $3K -- which typically took over 3 years. However, at $500, we would place a lien on the property.

I've always wondered what timeshare HOAs do. For timeshares with value, they probably place a lien and don't allow use. They must wait until they have group of foreclosures and go to court with the group to reduce the per TS cost to foreclose. But unlike homes which have value, many timeshare do not.

It may cost the TS HOA thousands in legal fees to foreclose on a group of worthless weeks. It may be better to just allow members to return the week to the HOA without foreclosing--but then they may get a flood of weeks.

Probably all that happens to the owner who defaults is that the TS owner loses the TS and it shows on their credit score. It may also negatively impact future employment if the employer requires a credit check, which is becoming common.

Obviously, current owners bear the cost of the deadbeats. The HOA loses MFs, incurs legal expenses, and must now resell the weeks. About 6% of the MF at my resort is to cover this bad debt. In worst case, the resort can go bankrupt if bad debt gets too high.
 

LannyPC

TUG Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2010
Messages
4,777
Reaction score
2,406
Points
448
Location
British Columbia
Obviously, current owners bear the cost of the deadbeats. The HOA loses MFs, incurs legal expenses, and must now resell the weeks. About 6% of the MF at my resort is to cover this bad debt.

We just received the proposed 2011 budget from the resort where we own. Each interval is being assessed $19.68 for "Provision for Uncollectable Accounts". :mad:
 

weh8625

Tug Review Crew: Rookie
TUG Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2008
Messages
107
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Location
Houston, Texas
Property Transfer Cites

You have asked for cites about property transfer, here they are. Since the idea of forcing someone to take your deed is so ridiculous, I had to go back quite a ways to find any cases:

" ... we are not aware of any principle of law by which a title is thrust upon an unwilling grantee" - Lick v. Diaz, 37 Cal. 437 at 444

"This statute does not force any obligation upon an unwilling grantee ..." - Colchester Sav. Bank v. Brown, 75 Conn. 69

" ... the grantee must generally evince a purpose to accept the conveyance, as it is not competent for the grantor by his act alone to impose a title or the conditions of a conveyance upon an unwilling grantee. An exception to this rule is where the grantee is an infant, or under disability, and the conveyance is beneficial to the grantee." - Sutton v. Gibson, 119 Ky. 422 at 425

So the idea of forcing someone to take your deed is probably out. Maybe one of you can start a company that accepts deeds for a fee, then rents out the units for the maintenance fee. But as stated above, a shell company that accepts deeds is a fraud and will be ineffective.
 

e.bram

Guest
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
3,185
Reaction score
124
Points
399
Location
Fort Lee, NJ
FredM:
Ask DaveH. He is the one that mentioned case law.
Quote by FredM
"Our statements have been reinforced thousands of times by the actions of the laws you choose to disagree with."
Now which actions are we talking about, please state them with specificity.
 
Last edited:

DavidnRobin

TUG Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2005
Messages
11,812
Reaction score
2,224
Points
698
Location
San Francisco Bay Area
Resorts Owned
WKORV OFD (Maui)
WPORV (Kauai)
WSJ-VGV (St. John)
WKV (Scottsdale)
I hadn't read this forum in a while - and... LOL - this troll is back...
hey genius - how about this? just don't pay the MFs - you have absolutely no obligation to do so - you are right - everyone is wrong... now take your hand off the mouse and back into pants...
 

theo

TUG Review Crew: Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2007
Messages
9,032
Reaction score
2,268
Points
648
Location
New England Coast
Ignore...

This might be an appropriately perfect time to remind tormented TUG posters and readers of a truly wonderful TUG feature which I have come to utilize and greatly appreciate:

In the upper left hand corner of this page you will see a "button" entitled User CP (presumably stands for Control Panel). When you click on that button, you are brought to a page on which you can enter specific TUG user names to "ignore". Upon doing so, the posts of the lucky winner(s) will never be seen again when you log in to TUG in the future.

It's wonderful. Just saying....:rolleyes: :shrug: :rolleyes:
 

Passepartout

TUG Review Crew: Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2007
Messages
28,462
Reaction score
17,213
Points
1,299
Location
Twin Falls, Eye-Duh-Hoe
Reading this thread is like watching a train wreck- you know what's gonna happen, but keep watching anyway!

Jim Ricks
 

kool_kat

TUG Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Messages
208
Reaction score
7
Points
228
Location
Knoxville, TN
Resorts Owned
HGVC at Tuscany and HGVC at Flamingo; DVC at Bay Lake Towers
So the idea of forcing someone to take your deed is probably out. Maybe one of you can start a company that accepts deeds for a fee, then rents out the units for the maintenance fee. But as stated above, a shell company that accepts deeds is a fraud and will be ineffective.

Thank goodness for the substance over form doctrine which allows the courts to go after these ridiculous schemes.
 

FrugalFrank

newbie
Joined
Nov 16, 2010
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
The Great State of New Jersey
Intriguing concept,

and I thank OP for the posing the question as it has evoked many varied and worthwhile opinions. I must also say that it is unfortunate that no one has weighed in on this issue that is, or was formerly on the developer/builder side.

I think that it boils down to this: Although there may not have been an explicit agreement by the TS purchaser on the resale market, or the giftee, taking ownership (deed recorded by county, and owner of record change recognized by the resort) does carry an expectation to abide by the terms and conditions of the association. The property taxes must be paid by each owner, and the association fees must also be shared equally.

While one may not have willfully and knowingly obliged themself to abide the T&C yet there are consequences that attach for non-payment of fees which are probably legally enforceable.

Perhaps interested parties might concact the Attorney General's office in their TS ownership state posing the identical question. Response should be free of charge.
 
Last edited:

e.bram

Guest
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
3,185
Reaction score
124
Points
399
Location
Fort Lee, NJ
FrugalFrank is right, it could be a capitol crime. Or maybe the state could get a restraining order forbidding the miscreant from ever purchasing a TS again and forfeiting any TS already owned.
 

DowneastMaine

TUG Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2010
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Southern Maine
What happens if I just quit paying my maintenance fees?

Hi All,

Has anyone ever heard that the resort can also, after a foreclosuer, send your default judgment to the IRS and unearned income.

So, now you have credit reporting and the balance that you have to pay the government.


Let me know if you have ever heard of this.

Thanks
 
Top