I think the housekeeping tokens not transferring with credit rentals and guest certificate fees are all smoke and mirrors if Worldmark suggests these would have any impact on a megarenter. A 72,000 point account gets 7 housekeeping credits and 8 guest certificates. (I think...) That covers more than what they need for six 12,000 point rentals. If that person rents in 144,000 points, they now need to spend an extra $200ish in housekeeping and guest certificates for a 12,000 point rental - so their profit goes from $860 to $660 if they can rent a 12,000 point unit for $1700. That isn't going to keep a renting owner from renting out their unit. It's just going to decrease their bottom line by about 25% on rented in credits. Posts suggest that some people believe Worldmark instituted fees to change the renting habits of megarenters. Certainly it hurt their bottom line, but it wouldn't stop someone from renting units out unless they believed that earning $660 for doing very little work other than knowing some workaround to the 13 month reservation rule was not worth the money. It seems to me that the new costs (having to pay for a housekeeping token and a guest certificate fee) for transferred credits used for reservations are just a bonus to the management company because they earn at least 10-15% in management fees for every dollar spent running the Worldmark system. The more money coming in, the more management can earn. If these new fees actually ultimately lower current maintenance fees (doubtful) that could help the average owner.