Yet another classic Perryism (def: "technique whereby an individual evades the issue when proven wrong, often by ignoring the facts presented and throwing out irrelevant platitudes").
You won't win any arguments by insulting my intelligence. This may come as a surprise to you, but when you post on this forum, the posts remain readable even several days later, so that others can actually look back and see the earlier post. Therefore, when you ask a question, then claim you asked a different question, or when you promise to join a DC if they meet certain criteria, then claim the criteria were different (or that you didn't say that), or when you challenge someone to find "just one" instance of something and then try to deny reality, or when you claim people are putting words in your mouth when they are in fact quoting a previous quote verbatim, or when you make ridiculous assertions about Jack the Ripper, or when you claim that your experience with a smoothie shop in a strip mall in Missouri outweighs large studies by the SBA, etc., people can actually follow the threads and see that you are constantly contradicting yourself, making ridiculous assertions, and refusing to acknowledge when you are proven wrong.
Trying to detract from these issues by insulting my intelligence simply makes you appear immature and petty. If you send me a PM with your mailing address, I will gladly send you an excellent book on logic, as well as a copy of Miss Manners Guide to Etiquette, two books that you obviously need quite desperately.
