TUG MEMBERS: Joining TUG does not automatically register you as a user of the TUG Bulletin Board. You must register yourself.


*ads are disabled when logged in as a member*
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 25 years!

    Join tens of thousands of other owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered!
    Dismiss Notice
  3. TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $11,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $11Million dollars
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free! Join tens of thousands of other owners who get this every week! Latest resort reviews and the most important topics discussed by owners during the week!
    Dismiss Notice
  5. TUG is trying out a new program that will trade you a TUG membership for a Timeshare resort review if you are an expired member, or even just a guest here on the forums!

    Read more here
    Dismiss Notice
  6. Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    Read more Here
    Dismiss Notice
  7. Follow the TUG Member Banner as it travels the world on vacation with Timeshare owners! Also sign up to get the banner sent to you so you can submit a photo of your vacation with the banner to share with TUG! Banner Thread
    Dismiss Notice
  8. TUG has now joined Priceline.com as an affiliate!

    Members and guests who book air travel, rental cars and even Cruise Vacations thru TUG's priceline links will now support TUG in the process!

    Read more here
  9. A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!
    Dismiss Notice

Ranking the Top Timeshare Systems

Discussion in 'All Other Timeshare Systems' started by mesamirage, Oct 19, 2006.

  1. Fredm

    Fredm TUG Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,776
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    246
    Location:
    Palm Desert, CA
    One does indeed learn new things every day. Thank you for the information.

    Emmy:
    I apologize for stating the single confirmation incorrectly. It indeed is a wrinkle that affords a multi-week owner the ability to manipulate the reservation system if intent on doing so. For those that do so, it is an unfair advantage over single week owners.
     
  2. DavidnRobin

    DavidnRobin TUG Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2005
    Messages:
    10,338
    Likes Received:
    760
    Trophy Points:
    448
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Resorts Owned:
    WKORV OFD (Maui)
    WPORV (Kauai)
    WSJ-VGV (St. John)
    WKV (Scottsdale)
    Steve -

    You know my vote already - SVO - of course. For all the reasons I have stated over the last 1.5 years.

    The others? We don't care which order.

    It all comes down to what ones vacation priorities are. SVO certainly has it's drawbacks - and certainly it's distractors - but it fits our vacation desires best.
     
  3. sharktzu

    sharktzu TUG Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Temple City, CA
    O.k. I'll chime in also although I've already voted with my wallet. All of the systems have their strong points and weak suits, but I like Starwood based on the overall quality of their resorts and the locations they've choosen. I also like how aggressive they've become about expanding and building more resorts. HGVC and Marriott would be tied for 2nd in my book. Hyatt's are nice, but there just aren't enough of them.
     
  4. mesamirage

    mesamirage TUG Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2006
    Messages:
    374
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    228
    Location:
    Chandler, AZ
    Sorry Sharktzu... I would like to count your vote, but the Michigan Avatar voids you of any voting privs... :D

    GO UW HUSKIES!! :cheer:
     
  5. mesamirage

    mesamirage TUG Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2006
    Messages:
    374
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    228
    Location:
    Chandler, AZ
    David... I'm the Hyatt guy.. and I still voted Starwood #1 myself. Hard to argue against the quality of the resorts! It's top tier/top shelf and we like that... its just a bit $$$ but you do get your $$$ worth!! (except for the reservation system... but I won't revisit that)

    Steve
     
  6. JonathanIT

    JonathanIT TUG Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2007
    Messages:
    410
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    L.A.-But I'd rather be on Brokeback Mtn.
    My vote goes to Hilton in a heartbeat... but then again I don't own anywhere else! :D

    I have to say that downgrading Hilton based on locations is completely unwarranted. Yes, they have too many properties in Florida. But who doesn't love Hawaii? And thank god for Las Vegas, because it's cheap to own! But many have failed to recognize the effort with which they are addressing this issue, and the breadth of Hilton's future expansion.

    *They already added a close affiliation with four Intrawest properties, including: Whistler, BC; Tremblant, Quebec and Palm Desert, CA

    *They also have a gorgeous property in Breckenridge, CO, the Valdoro Mountain Lodge. I hope to go back this year.

    *They are building an incredible property in NYC. I visited the site when was there in June; I'm really excited about this one. Just a couple blocks from Central Park!

    *The Grand Marbrisas in Carlsbad, CA should open next year.

    *The Hilton Vilamoura Vacation Club in Portugal just opened.

    *Their close affiliation with Fiesta Americana in Mexico now includes Acapulco, as well as Los Cabos and Cancun.

    *The Grand Waikikian in Honolulu is going to be awesome! (ok, I love Honolulu).

    My point is that HGVC recognizes that owners/members have consistently put expansion at the top of the priority list. I think they're doing a good job.

    BTW, I looked into Marriott when I was in Hawaii at the Grand Ko'Olina property. I have to say that the property/accommodations are spectacular... but I could not believe that they are on the "old school" trading weeks system for their timeshares. I would never even consider this, having experienced Hilton's point system flexibility. That was an absolute deal breaker.

    If I purchased at another company, it would (and will probably be) with Disney Vacation Club. I am a Disney fan and go to Orlando several times a year.
     
  7. taffy19

    taffy19 Guest

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Messages:
    5,666
    Likes Received:
    524
    Trophy Points:
    398
    Thank you, Fred. How about my math? :eek: Did that make sense or not? Dave, please correct me if I am wrong here. I assume too that there are less holiday or vacation weeks in the system than in my example but that was for emphasizing my point. Here is clearly where the advantage of owning multiple weeks comes in handy.

    I already knew from experience that the best weeks go to the multiple week owners and it was a brilliant strategy for the Marriott to sell more weeks. I am all for the Marriott treating their most loyal customers royally but not at our (single week owners) expense.

    My votes go to the Hyatt and the Hilton as these systems seem to be more fair. I am not voting about quality because I have stayed at so few of the resorts. The Westins look beautiful to me.
     
  8. taffy19

    taffy19 Guest

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Messages:
    5,666
    Likes Received:
    524
    Trophy Points:
    398
    Dave, you had answered my question already in my last post. I had missed your post in the previous page. Thank you.

    It's even more obvious to me now that people will have to keep buying more weeks if they want to compete for the best vacation weeks and the holidays too and certainly when more multi-week owners are added in the 50% pool.

    I still don't understand why we had to call several weeks on a row one year but it must have been that the dates, they offered us, were not acceptable so we tried two times more to get our week in March. Last year, we got a cancellation by calling later that week again as this recommendation was posted here.
     
  9. linsj

    linsj TUG Review Crew: Veteran TUG Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Messages:
    1,775
    Likes Received:
    83
    Trophy Points:
    258
    Location:
    Chicagoland
    Resorts Owned:
    HGVC
    My vote goes to Hilton for #1. I bought HGVC because the points system makes the most sense for my needs: flexibility to book the number of days I want (with a minimum of 3) without being tied to weeks at a time; getting 3+ weeks out of my 5,000 points every year, including part or all of that in Hawaii (I own in Orlando); being able to see what's available when on the web site and book it on the site; lowest cost to get into.

    Yes, I wish there were more properties; and, as a result, I've looked at the other 3 hotel clubs. But none of them come close to the price, flexibility, and simplicity of Hilton.
     
  10. Fredm

    Fredm TUG Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,776
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    246
    Location:
    Palm Desert, CA
    Emmy.
    Your math does not recognize that under no circumstances can more than 50% of any one week be reserved at 13 months. No matter what.

    I think our point of disagreement comes from which measure is used.
    I am using the percentage of weeks owned. You refer to the percentage of individual owners.

    I believe that if it were an entirely democratic system (which it is not), and put to a vote, each owner would receive one vote for each share owned.
    I cannot say for certain how such a vote would come out, but assuming each owner voted their personal best interests, it would likely fall in favor of the multiple share owners.

    Since a system does exist which recognizes the different reservation needs of multiple week owners, a ceiling of 50% of each week seems as reasonable an approach as any. No system can be entirely equitable to every circumstance. However, Marriott's system makes an attempt at it. No doubt, it is based in part on Marriott's interests as well.

    It is not at all a forgone conclusion that if there were not a 13 month reservation policy that single week owners would fare better at 12 months. They may fare worse. Those multiple week owners can just as easily tear through the inventory. Unless you are advocating that those who own multiple weeks should not be able to reserve consecutive weeks in a single reservation call. That would really cause an uproar that would be difficult to justify, IMHO.
    At least the current system provides an orderly mechanism for the needs of all owners to be addressed in a reasonable way overall.
     
  11. Troopers

    Troopers TUG Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    831
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Bay Area, CA
    I'm a newbie and find this dialogue infomative (and quite interresting) since I do not owe a TS.

    Does the Mariott 13 month reservation rule extend to owners with multiple weeks of the same resort or owners with multiple one week resorts?

    The below assumes an owner with the multiple weeks of the same resort
    I think it is fair for one to be able to reserve multiple weeks (consecutive or not) as one reservation 13 months in advance at the home resort. However, if the owner cancelled any portion of the reservation, the entire reservation is cancelled. The owner is receiving a benefit as a multiple week owner to be able to book a month before single week owners. I think it is unfair for the owner to cherry pick the desirable weeks and cancel a week without any penalty. If a two week owner was certain about one week and uncertain about another week, he/she could reserve the certain week at 13 months and the uncertain week at 12 months.

    The below assumes an owner with multiple one week resorts
    I think it is unfair if one is able to reserve multiple weeks (consecutive or not) 13 months in advance at any of the resorts owned. An owner should only be able to reserve the number of weeks at a resort equaling the number of weeks owned at that resort (in this case, only one week). I think it is fair that the owner be able to do this 13 months out. This is the benefit of a multiple one week resort owner.

    If I'm not making any sense, no worries...I'm a newbie. Blame me!
     
    Last edited: Aug 6, 2007
  12. taffy19

    taffy19 Guest

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Messages:
    5,666
    Likes Received:
    524
    Trophy Points:
    398
    OK, point well taken. Thank you. :)
     
  13. tomandrobin

    tomandrobin TUG Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    4,041
    Likes Received:
    79
    Trophy Points:
    283
    Location:
    Bel Air, Maryland
    Since it seems all the major hotel based timeshare systems have thier own internal exchange/reservation system, in addtion to II or RCI, why doesn't Marriott have its own internal system? Have they looked at adding an internal system or did thier use to be one?
     
  14. Fredm

    Fredm TUG Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,776
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    246
    Location:
    Palm Desert, CA
    See page 4 of this thread.
     
  15. taffy19

    taffy19 Guest

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Messages:
    5,666
    Likes Received:
    524
    Trophy Points:
    398
    Yes, they are working on one and there are several posts about it if you search for it.

    Fred, I only see two pages?
     
  16. tomandrobin

    tomandrobin TUG Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    4,041
    Likes Received:
    79
    Trophy Points:
    283
    Location:
    Bel Air, Maryland
    If they add an internal system, wouldn't that cause problems with existing owners? You have so many existing owners
     
  17. Dave M

    Dave M TUG Lifetime Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Messages:
    12,242
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    473
    Location:
    Sun City Hilton Head, SC
    Marriott's internal trading system would serve all owners. No perceived advantage or disadvantage for existing owners.

    It's too deep for this thread, but, as Emmy has suggested, there are several threads on the Marriott forum that delve into the speculation of what Marriott's internal trading system will look like.
     
  18. saluki

    saluki TUG Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    513
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    228
    Location:
    STL
    It depends on how your TUG "User Control Panel" is set up. If you are at the default setting for posts shown per page, this thread is currently 6 pages.
     
  19. tomandrobin

    tomandrobin TUG Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    4,041
    Likes Received:
    79
    Trophy Points:
    283
    Location:
    Bel Air, Maryland
    I wonder if allowing all owners, wether developer or resale will put pressure on Starwood to change its system.

    It seems that Hyatt, Hilton, DVC treat owners equal in thier system. Marriott is apparently heading that way. Not sure is Starwood could go back and fix thier Mandatory/Voluntary mess.
     
  20. Dave M

    Dave M TUG Lifetime Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Messages:
    12,242
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    473
    Location:
    Sun City Hilton Head, SC
    There is no evidence at all that Marriott is or isn't headed that way. As I suggested, you should consider reading some of the threads on this subject in the Marriott forum for more info.
     
  21. Fredm

    Fredm TUG Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,776
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    246
    Location:
    Palm Desert, CA
    Starwood could fix their Mandatory/Voluntary mess in a New York minute, if they wanted to. They could do so within the current system structure.

    The only difference between M and V resorts is that M resorts have SVN membership attached by deed. Membership is automatic at transfer of title, and ongoing membership is mandatory. Resale buyers of V resorts must apply for membership. Currently, Starwood is not approving resale applications. They could do so at any time they choose.

    Further, the application fee would be reoccurring for all subsequent resale membership applications. There is no fee associated with mandatory resort resales. For this reason, I believe Starwood will, sooner or later, "fix" the current situation. The revenue stream will be too attractive to ignore.

    Currently, the conventional wisdom is that Starwood believes it in their marketing interests to withhold the membership. I am not so sure that is true any longer.
    The recent announcement from Starwood that all future resorts will be Voluntary, may mean exactly the opposite. Since they would not receive ongoing SVN application fees from mandatory resort resales., they just may be setting it up so that the application fee stream from Voluntary resorts will be maximized.

    Starwood must know by now that they are earning the animosity of original owners of Voluntary resorts, when those owners discover the devaluation of their purchase at resale.
    Marriott owners simply cannot transfer Marriott points at resale . It is not hurting Marriott's ability to sell timeshares. If Starwood would leave it at that, it would not hurt their marketing efforts either.
    Starwood is not stupid. Which is why my opinion regarding SVN membership to Voluntary resort resales is what it is.

    To take one step further, Starwood V resale prices have been pounded into the cellar as a result of the current situation. Given their excellent trade value in I.I., the very low prices are unwarranted by any real utility measure. If I am right and Starwood reverses course, current V resort resales may prove to be the value buy of the last decade.
     
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2007
  22. duke

    duke TUG Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2005
    Messages:
    655
    Likes Received:
    80
    Trophy Points:
    238
    Location:
    California
    I agree! Buy Voluntary (resale) and Requalify. You get high value StarOptions to exchange and StarPoints for hotels if you want. Also, if you can get to 5* ELITE quickly you can get the last of the SPG Platinum for life.

    Its a bargain!

    ALSO, if you follow Fred's strategy here....I think that his thought that SVO might, at somepoint, let Voluntary resales be allowed in SVN for a fee....they would only be able to trade for StarOptions. They never would give the ability to exchage for StarPoints or participate in the ELITE program.

    Requalify is the better route and can be done now.
     
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2007
  23. jerseygirl

    jerseygirl TUG Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Messages:
    3,327
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Duke -- your advice on requalification has always been excellent. But, I don't think most participants of this board put any real value on the Elite program or the ability to exchange for StarPoints. Fred's comments are not designed to convince people to requalify.

    On another note, if Starwood ever does reverse course on resale membership in the network, I think you'll see the price of the current Mandatory resorts decline, and the price of the current Voluntary resorts increase significantly. Of course, there are exceptions, such as the following:

    The "market" valued these 81000 StarOptions at a little over $0.123/StarOption:

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=110154479609&ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:IT&ih=001

    And these 44000 StarOptions at $0.29/StarOption:

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=200136239847&ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:IT&ih=010

    The first one is a lousy week. Educated buyers realize how difficult it will be to trade for better weeks. The second one is a good, but not great, gold week.

    St. John will also sell at a premium because the market doesn't care about the number of StarOptions. People are not buying to trade.

    For the majority of the other resorts, there is plenty of great competition in the same markets. My prediction is that they will resell based on a "parity" StarOption price (whatever that turns out to be).
     
  24. duke

    duke TUG Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2005
    Messages:
    655
    Likes Received:
    80
    Trophy Points:
    238
    Location:
    California
    Jersey.....Requalify is value if you can get to 5* ELITE and get SPG Platinum for Life.

    Also, There are some very high value Voluntary resorts that have high StarPoint conversions. Add to that SVN 10% bonus and the value of buying Voluntary and converting to StarPoints then to AirPoints with 25% bonus and using for first or business class travel is a bargain.

    Duke
     
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2007
  25. jerseygirl

    jerseygirl TUG Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Messages:
    3,327
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Can you point me to the benefits of SPG Platinum?

    Can you give a specific example vs. the maintenance fee? I tend to use "upgrade" miles for international and never pay attention to the other options. Recent example -- First class ticket I needed (okay, wanted :) ) was over $12000 or 250,000* miles (lots of timeshare weeks!). I bought the cheap ticket ($1500) and paid an $800 upgrade fee. I'll earn almost enough miles to "repay" the 25000 upgrade ... and didn't give up a timeshare week.

    *It is possible to get a first class ticket in this market for 120K miles, but you have to be exceptionally lucky and flexible. If your timeframe is short, you need 250K miles.
     
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2007

Share This Page