LisaRex, ... Participation by non-board members must be allowed unless a majority of a quorum of the board votes otherwise (tie vote doesn't do it - a majority is 50% plus 1):
" §514A-83.1 Board meetings. (a) All meetings of the board of directors, other than executive sessions, shall be open to all members of the association, and association members who are not on the board of directors may participate in any deliberation or discussion, other than executive sessions, unless a majority of a quorum of the board of directors votes otherwise.
(b) The board of directors, with the approval of a majority of a quorum of its members, may adjourn a meeting and reconvene in executive session to discuss and vote upon personnel matters or litigation in which the association is or may become involved. The nature of any and all business to be considered in executive session shall first be announced in open session. [L 2007, c 244, pt of §2]"
The motion should be made at the beginning of the meeting and the yeas and nays recorded in the minutes for the vote on the motion.
Assuming that the board says that only an "Owners Open Forum" will be allowed at or before the beginning of the meeting, whoever is going should have a printed copy of the questions with him/her and, if the board says that the questions are quite numerous, the person should state that he/she wants the printed questions submitted as part of the record and, if there is not enough time for answering all the questions at the meeting, should ask for written answers to the individual questions to be provided by mail and filed with the written questions as part of the record of the proceedings for the meeting.
Closing the meeting to all participation by owners is possible, but it sure would look bad. Stating that time is short, but refusing to accept and file the written questions and provide written answers would look even worse.
By no means should the person submitting the questions (written or orally) become argumentative. The right to know what's going on at the resort is the right of any owner and the annual meeting is the appropriate forum to ask the questions I drafted. Starwood would be hard-pressed to ignore the questions given the assessment increases, the stalled permits for Maui 3 and the large percentage increase in the proposed 2010 MF over the 2009 MF. At the very least, some of the questions will have to be answered. Although, many more probably will be finessed.
The advantage of getting written answers to the questions is that if the answers are not clear, the framework has been established for follow-up questions. Communication will have been established (I hope). ... eom